Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /usr/www/users/brhine/muddle/amphigouri/wp-settings.php on line 472

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /usr/www/users/brhine/muddle/amphigouri/wp-settings.php on line 487

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /usr/www/users/brhine/muddle/amphigouri/wp-settings.php on line 494

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /usr/www/users/brhine/muddle/amphigouri/wp-settings.php on line 530

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /usr/www/users/brhine/muddle/amphigouri/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /usr/www/users/brhine/muddle/amphigouri/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /usr/www/users/brhine/muddle/amphigouri/wp-includes/theme.php on line 623

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/www/users/brhine/muddle/amphigouri/wp-settings.php:472) in /usr/www/users/brhine/muddle/amphigouri/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: shavings. http://www.muddle.org/amphigouri/2003/05/12/shavings.html varnished nonsense Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:32:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Medley http://www.muddle.org/amphigouri/2003/05/12/shavings.html#comment-47 Medley Fri, 16 May 2003 12:11:21 +0000 http://www.muddle.org/amphigouri/2003/05/12/shavings.html#comment-47 Well, I'm far from one to say follow the 'rules' all the time, just making an observation on this particular picture and ROT was a good shorthand. I think I'm pretty partial to it, anyway. My two most recent favorite pics (<a href="http://www.uncorked.org/medley/archives/2003/05/11/index.html#000708" rel="nofollow">here</a>) employ it, for example. It was not conscious -- I took a lot of pics those days, many of which were crap.<br><br> I'm having focus troubles with my camera, too -- I can't figure out whether it's my ignorance or the camera. Probably the former... need time to practice... don't have time... waah. Well, I’m far from one to say follow the ‘rules’ all the time, just making an observation on this particular picture and ROT was a good shorthand. I think I’m pretty partial to it, anyway. My two most recent favorite pics (here) employ it, for example. It was not conscious — I took a lot of pics those days, many of which were crap.

I’m having focus troubles with my camera, too — I can’t figure out whether it’s my ignorance or the camera. Probably the former… need time to practice… don’t have time… waah.

]]>
By: beth http://www.muddle.org/amphigouri/2003/05/12/shavings.html#comment-46 beth Thu, 15 May 2003 18:15:16 +0000 http://www.muddle.org/amphigouri/2003/05/12/shavings.html#comment-46 <p> Yeah. I wasn't really concerned w/ the rule of thirds when taking this pic; I was trying to get the bloody camera to focus the way I wanted it to on that one middle shaving (I'm still having some difficulty getting the camera to do what I want - seems like it was easier back when I first had it, prior to it needing fixes). </p> <p> And, rule of thirds be damned - there are some pictures (some mine, some random others) that don't follow the rules explicitly but still capture my interest or just appeal to me for no real reason. :) This picture is one of those, I guess - there's something about it that I like, and that's all that really matters to me. ;) </p><br /> Yeah. I wasn’t really concerned w/ the rule of thirds when taking this pic; I was trying to get the bloody camera to focus the way I wanted it to on that one middle shaving (I’m still having some difficulty getting the camera to do what I want - seems like it was easier back when I first had it, prior to it needing fixes).

And, rule of thirds be damned - there are some pictures (some mine, some random others) that don’t follow the rules explicitly but still capture my interest or just appeal to me for no real reason. :) This picture is one of those, I guess - there’s something about it that I like, and that’s all that really matters to me. ;)

]]>
By: Medley http://www.muddle.org/amphigouri/2003/05/12/shavings.html#comment-45 Medley Thu, 15 May 2003 13:50:08 +0000 http://www.muddle.org/amphigouri/2003/05/12/shavings.html#comment-45 Hmmm. Neat picture. The only thing I might have done differently is make a little bit more off-center (rule of thirds). :) Hmmm. Neat picture. The only thing I might have done differently is make a little bit more off-center (rule of thirds). :)

]]>